3D Trade Marks – Yes, there really is such a thing! All You Need to Know (& Understand!)

3D Trade Marks – Yes, there really is such a thing! All You Need to Know (& Understand!)

 

Three-dimensional (3D) trade marks are currently something of a hot topic and some of the biggest names in the licensing, toy and nursery sectors have had their fair share of media exposure in recent years because of their success, or indeed failure, to get their brand protected with this fairly new form of IP rights.

Coca Cola, Mondelez (Toblerone), Hard Rock Café, and Chanel are a few to have obtained protection for their product’s shape or packaging because of unique and distinctive characteristics; these successful applications undoubtedly cement their place in the commercial marketplace and support ongoing success.  In contrast Nestle (Kit Kat), Jaguar Land Rover, Lego and Rubik’s Brand (Rubik’s Cube), all failed in their bids for 3D trade mark protection.   

At Wynne-Jones IP our trade mark team believe that 3D trade marks can provide unparalleled commercial benefits and industry success.  The Rubik’s Cube high-profile case when they lost their 3D trade mark rights in 2016 should have made toy companies sit up and think about 3D protection and ensuring they are adequately protected for now, and the future.  The EUIPO has taken some harsh decisions and several brands have failed to gain this protection, when many would agree they were probably deserving of them.  

But don’t let this discourage you if you’re confident you have a legitimate case in seeking this protection – give our team a call and we’ll be able to have an open discussion on your queries, concerns and requirements.

What is different about a 3D trade mark?

It needs to fulfil the standard criteria for registration but must not be descriptive and needs to be able to distinguish goods and/or services of one undertaking from those of others. Simply put, the more uncommon or fanciful the shape, the more likely the rights will be granted.

What makes it desirable? 

If registered, it should provide the owner with a right to the exclusive use of the shape of the product itself or for the packaging, in relation to a range of goods and/or services. This provides the owner with a clear commercial advantage in both manufacturing and sales, plus a monopoly in perpetuity so long as it’s renewed and used.

The 3D criteria and those who’ve succeeded and failed: 

This first criterion is where the shape of the goods is unique to the generic function of them. For example, the shape of a football will be refused protection.  Stokke A/S was granted a 3D trade mark for its Tripp Trapp high-chair but this was invalidated because it was found that the shape results from the nature of the goods themselves.

The second criterion has been the pitfall for many branded products such as Lego - the mark applied for was a shape with essential characteristics which performed the technical function of the product i.e. Lego bricks attaching to each another.  Days after Lego’s registration was obtained competitor Mega Brands contested it and a lengthy legal process followed with Lego’s registration ruled invalid as its shape allowed, and was necessary, for the product to achieve a technical result.

The third criterion relates exclusively to the intrinsic value of the shape and does not take any account of the attractiveness of the goods flowing from the reputation of the trade mark or its proprietor; this criterion has become the subject of many legal cases.  In the famous 2016 London Black Cab case the cab’s shape was found to be giving substantial value to the goods and was rejected as it was already registered as a design.

A successful example and one of the first 3D registrations is for the global iconic drinks brand Coca Cola.  The distinctive bottle, with its recognisable contouring, was deemed individual enough to receive 3D trade mark protection.  Coca Cola’s bottles are instantly equated with the company itself, and Coca Cola has been able to maintain exclusivity for its own bottle’s unique shape and appearance on high street shelves worldwide, helping to set it apart as a market leader.

The Wynne-Jones IP viewpoint: “The more distinctive a brand is, and its individual shape, appearance and ability to be linked exclusively with the overarching company, the greater the chance of success.  We encourage any companies considering registering their product as a 3D trade mark to thoroughly research the marketplace and talk to us.  3D trade mark rights remain a complex and evolving area of intellectual property law but future rulings will help define the scope of registrations made.  Success, whilst rare, can result in transformative benefits and brand rights for any company.”

Related News

ECJ ruling sees Louboutin walk all over the competition
news

ECJ ruling sees Louboutin walk all over the competition

The question over whether a shoe sole can be trade marked has taken a designer step forward this week. Christian Louboutin has won the backing of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) in its ongoing legal battle to protect its world-renowned red soled shoes.

6 ways IP can benefit your business
news

6 ways IP can benefit your business

Protecting your IP will obviously require spending money, so why would you do so?  We've looked at six benefits why you should consider investing in the protection of your IP...

 

3D trade marks – The key trends, the success stories, and the future
news

3D trade marks – The key trends, the success stories, and the future

Three dimensional (3D) trade marks have featured prominently in the news in recent years due to the coverage given to some of the world’s biggest companies, which have achieved great successes and failures in relation to registration in equal measure. Gareth Jenkins and Don Pennant at leading intellectual property firm Wynne Jones IP, discuss why an investment in a 3D trade marks can provide unparalleled commercial benefits and industry success. However, caution is advised, and any potential owner should thoroughly research previous cases before making any application, so that a clear and realistic expectation of the scope of rights obtained can be considered.

news

One step closer...UK ratifies the UPC Agreement

It has now been announced that the UK has ratified the Unified Patent Court Agreement (UPCA). This takes the Unified Patent Court one step closer to becoming an operational international court.

news

Wynne Jones IP’s experts speak out for World IP Day

Four Wynne Jones IP experts are answering all the burning questions to help celebrate World IP Day 2018. The international initiative, celebrated on April 26, is this year highlighting the invaluable contribution made by inspirational women who have shaped the intellectual property profession globally. Here our trainee patent attorneys offer their insights into the IP industry, reveal client misconceptions, and share their top tips!

UK design applications go up with Brexit on the horizon
news

UK design applications go up with Brexit on the horizon

The UKIPO has published some figures on designs registered at the UKIPO in the last 10 years, in response to a Freedom of Information request.

Are you Brexit Ready?
news

Are you Brexit Ready?

Brexit presents a daunting range of challenges to businesses of all kinds. Increasingly important to the value of any business, Intellectual Property (IP) rights will be impacted in a variety of ways and no more so than in the consumer products space.  At Wynne-Jones IP we solved the Brexit issue long before we knew UK citizens would vote ‘leave’.  We established a pan-European business that runs under its own entity called [READ MORE]... 

UK ratified Hague Agreement for Industrial Designs
news

UK ratified Hague Agreement for Industrial Designs

We are pleased to see the announcement that the UK has completed its final step in joining the Hague Agreement for industrial designs, following our recent article regarding the delay on the UK’s membership of the Hague Agreement.