Turkish Declarations of Use

Turkish Declarations of Use

Have you recently validated your European patent in Turkey?  Did you know that in addition to paying annual renewal fees, Turkish law also requires you to submit a public declaration stating whether you have actively worked your invention in Turkey?

This declaration must be filed no later than 3-years from publication in the Turkish Patent Bulletin, or four years from the application date, whichever is the later.  A patent owner does not lose patent rights if they do not file a declaration in time, but this could leave them open to requests from third parties for a compulsory licence to work the invention.

If you have worked your invention (such as by manufacture, import, and/or sale) and are meeting market demand, you should file a declaration stating this by the deadline. You no longer need to submit evidence of use (e.g., import certificates), as the law changed to remove this requirement in 2020.

If you have not worked your invention, you can file a statement which includes an acceptable reason for non-use.  Reasons can include a current lack of market demand, or that you intend to work the invention in Turkey but there have been significant delays in launching the product due to a global pandemic.  If you do not give an acceptable reason for non-use, this can also leave you open to requests for compulsory licences.

There is no requirement in Turkey to file or update declarations on a regular basis.  Therefore, a declaration of non-use filed by the appropriate deadline will be outdated if the invention is later used.  You can challenge a request for a compulsory licence due to non-use in court by showing that you are actively using the invention and meeting market demand.  However, this process can incur (possibly significant) costs.  Therefore, it is best practice to file a new declaration of use once you start working the invention, even if it is after the deadline, as this will go on public record and can help to prevent third parties from approaching you for a compulsory licence.

Should you require any assistance or advice, please contact me at christina.schiavone@wynne-jones.com.

Related News

US Inventor Declarations and Assignments
news

US Inventor Declarations and Assignments

After a patent application has been filed, the inventor may be required to sign and submit various forms.  What happens if this is several years into the patent process, and the inventor can no longer be reached to sign these forms?  And what can you do now to prevent any complications from arising?

UKIPO ending temporary fee changes on 31 March 2021
news

UKIPO ending temporary fee changes on 31 March 2021

The UK Intellectual Property Office (UK IPO) temporarily reduced or removed certain official fees associated with patents, trade marks and registered designs because of the disruption caused by the Coronavirus pandemic. However, the temporary fee changes are set to end on 31 March 2021.

Insurance for IP Litigation Costs
news

Insurance for IP Litigation Costs

If you own any intellectual property (IP) rights, are you concerned about your exposure to litigation, and how you will finance any legal action?  One way to address this concern is by means of an insurance policy.

Does owning IP rights improve economic performance?
news

Does owning IP rights improve economic performance?

A recent study performed by the European Patent Office (EPO) and the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) has shown that companies which own at least one patent, trade mark or registered design generate on average 20% higher revenues per employee and pay their staff on average 19% higher wages compared to companies that do not own any of these intellectual property (IP) rights.

Let it go!
news

Let it go!

Keeping an IP budget afloat despite sunk costs.

The cost of securing IP can be heavily front loaded. Examples of such costs include patent drafting, pre-filing searches, filing fees, etc. These costs become “sunk” costs in that they cannot be recovered. Because IP protection can be a relatively long process, at any time during the process there are likely to be significant “prospective” costs: future costs that may be wholly or partially avoided depending on actions taken.

Managing your business-critical IP during the COVID-19 crisis
news

Managing your business-critical IP during the COVID-19 crisis

UK businesses are fighting for survival during the continuing COVID-19 outbreak and trying to trade under difficult conditions, the likes of which haven’t been seen in the living memory of most business people. If you’re afraid that your business is going to the wall, it probably isn’t the top of your mind to pay for a patent application for your new technology or a registration of the trade mark for your brand new clothing range, right?  Where is the money coming from to invest in such luxuries as IP, we hear you say, when staff are being furloughed and orders have been postponed?

Videoconferencing: the future of oral proceedings at the EPO?
news

Videoconferencing: the future of oral proceedings at the EPO?

The European Patent Office has announced that videoconferencing will become the norm for oral proceedings before examination and opposition divisions until at least 15 September 2021. But is this a taste of what the future holds for oral proceedings at the EPO?

EPO-CNIPA pilot for International Search
news

EPO-CNIPA pilot for International Search

On 12 November 2019, the EPO and CNIPA agreed to enhance their bilateral co-operation to give patent applicants filing an international patent application in English at the CNIPA, the choice to opt for the EPO as their ISA. A two year pilot programme launched on 1 December 2020, offers applicants filing international applications with the CNIPA or the International Bureau (IB) of the World Intellectual Property Office (WIPO) the opportunity to select the EPO as their ISA and as their International Preliminary Examining Authority (IPEA), rather than CNIPA.

aipex logo aipex logo aipex logo