Warning Notice of a New Type of Fake Trade Mark Payment Letter

Warning Notice of a New Type of Fake Trade Mark Payment Letter

Have you recently received a letter from the "Patent and Trademark Office" in Washington, DC? An official looking letter that demands payment and warns that your trade mark will be cancelled if you don’t pay? Here is one received by one of our clients recently. The letter gives the impression it’s a genuine communication from the USPTO with a US address, and asks for $925 to renew a trade mark. The letter has a graphic representation of the trade mark and the serial number of the mark, and an official-looking barcode on the letter. But this is not an official letter - it is sent from a private company and is a scam.

These private companies often use information freely available from the USPTO’s databases to send solicitations for, among other things, legal services, trade mark monitoring and renewal services, or registration of trade marks in unofficial publications or ‘registers’.

How can you tell it is a scam?

  • Read the fine print – in the letter the company admits that it is a ‘non-governmental company and is not connected to any of the governmental organizations’. Also, typos, poor grammar and spelling errors are common in this type of scam.
  • The USPTO will direct all official communications to your attorney or contact person of record, but this letter was sent direct to the company address. Also, all official correspondence will come from the ‘United States Patent and Trademark Office’ in Alexandria, VA, and if by e-mail, specifically from the domain ‘@uspto.gov.’
  • These letters often include a pre-paid reply envelope, as in this case, to encourage you to pay the ‘fee’ as quickly as possible.

 

 

 

 

What to do?

If you receive an unsolicited invitation, do not pay it until you have checked what services are being offered and if it is from an official source. We would always recommend that you check with your intellectual property attorney.

Many thanks to our client, SPTS Technologies Limited, for agreeing to allow us to reproduce the fake letter in its entirety. SPTS followed the best practice on dealing with these scam letters, and immediately brought it to our attention.

Ian Lambert and Susanna Stephen

 

Related News

From Examiner to Patent Attorney
news

From Examiner to Patent Attorney

As a Patent Attorney it’s useful to be able to think like an examiner and doing so is easier if you’ve been one. I started my career at the UKIPO in Newport as a Patent Examiner, a role that required looking at both the technical and legal aspects of a patent application and comparing the invention against those found in patent databases to decide whether to grant a patent. After two years I decide to cross to the “other side of the fence” in search of a new adventure. Jumping to the “other side” dispelled many myths revolving around the profession and helped me to understand that Attorneys and Examiners work toward the same goal: Getting good quality patents granted.

Ten big brands -  Welsh Cosmetics and Beauty sector
news

Ten big brands – Welsh Cosmetics and Beauty sector

Establishing a strong brand is pivotal to business success and protecting that brand is equally important. A brand’s intellectual property rights may include copyrights, trademarks, patents, and more.

Wales is a hotbed of great brands. In our regular series – ‘Ten big brands’ – next we take look at some of the best brands in the Welsh Cosmetics and Beauty sector.

Take a look through this selection, and feel free to get in touch with any big brands you think are missing.

Plant Patents at the EPO - are the Boards of Appeal a "bureaucratic obstacle"?
news

Plant Patents at the EPO - are the Boards of Appeal a "bureaucratic obstacle"?

Following on from our previous news articles and the EPO President's referral of the matter to the Enlarged Board of Appeal (EBA; case G 3/19), there has been recent  activity at the European Parliament with one MEP describing the whole issue as a "bureaucratic obstacle".

Ten big brands – Welsh food sector
news

Ten big brands – Welsh food sector

Establishing a strong brand is pivotal to business success and protecting that brand is equally important. A brand’s intellectual property rights may include copyrights, trademarks, patents, and more.

Wales is a hotbed of great brands. In a regular series of blogs, we take look at some of the best brands in the Welsh food sector.

Take a look through this selection, and feel free to get in touch with any big brands you think are missing.

Ten big brands – Welsh drinks sector
news

Ten big brands – Welsh drinks sector

Establishing a strong brand is pivotal to business success and protecting that brand is equally important. A brand’s intellectual property rights may include copyrights, trademarks, patents, and more.

Wales is a hotbed of great brands. In the first of a regular series, we look at some of the best brands in the Welsh drinks sector.

Informals Football: A true underdog story
news

Informals Football: A true underdog story

Last Friday 26th July 2019 our merry band of footballing misfits gathered at the Powerleague football pitches in Shoreditch, London to take part in the CIPA Informal’s 5-Aside Football Tournament. 

With everything to play for and nothing to lose, this is how it went...

Breaking EPO News - Decision G 2/19 - oral hearings of the Boards of Appeal can take place in Haar, and third parties cannot appeal clarity of claims during examination procedure.
news

Breaking EPO News - Decision G 2/19 - oral hearings of the Boards of Appeal can take place in Haar, and third parties cannot appeal clarity of claims during examination procedure.

Breaking EPO News - Decision G 2/19 - oral hearings of the Boards of Appeal can take place in Haar, and third parties cannot appeal clarity of claims during examination procedure.

In one of the fastest ever decisions on a referral, the EPO's Enlarged Board of Appeal yesterday (18 July 2019) found in case G 2/19 that (EPO brief communication; Google translation):

"A third party within the meaning of Article 115 EPC, who has appealed against the decision to grant a European patent, has no right to be heard by a Board of Appeal of the European Patent Office orally over its request to remove allegedly indistinct claims (Article 84 EPC) of the European patent to re-enter the examination procedure. Such a complaint does not have suspensive effect.

 

Wynne-Jones IP Supports Pride Month
news

Wynne-Jones IP Supports Pride Month

This weekend see's 50 years of Pride in London as the parade celebrates it's jubilee year and to mark the occasion we took the opportunity to speak to HR Manager, Lucy Gabb and Renewals Administrator, Liam Harkus about their experiences of being gay in the workplace. 

aipex logo aipex logo aipex logo