Small Irish business wins ’David and Goliath’ trade mark case against McDonalds

Small Irish business wins ’David and Goliath’ trade mark case against McDonalds

An Irish fast-food company has claimed a famous victory over one of the biggest brands in the world. Supermac, a beloved restaurant chain throughout Ireland and Northern Ireland, has successfully challenged McDonalds over its trade mark for ‘Big Mac’ in the European Union.

The case arose after Supermac attempted to expand into the EU, but was prevented by McDonalds owing to the alleged similarities between the terms ‘Supermac’ and ‘Big Mac’.  Supermac responded by applying to have McDonald’s ‘Big Mac’ EU trade mark registration revoked on the grounds of non-use.  Although McDonald’s filed evidence of use, the European Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) ruled that the evidence was insufficient.

McDonald’s has a reputation for vigorously enforcing its trade marks around the world.  In fact, in 2016, a European court ruled against a Singaporean company launching ‘MacCoffee’ in the EU, agreeing that the brand would unfairly benefit from the burger giant’s reputation.

Now the tables are turned. 

Supermac’s managing director, Pat McDonagh, described the case as a “David versus Goliath scenario”, referring to the huge disparity in the size of the companies. The Irish chain accused McDonalds of using “trademark bullying” to inhibit the growth of smaller brands, hailing the ruling as “the end of the McBully”.

While we are almost certain McDonald’s will appeal (because they have lost on a technicality), it is an interesting case which will undoubtedly encourage other Davids to follow suit. 

Victor Caddy at Wynne Jones IP says “It goes to show that it is always worth challenging a registered trade mark that is old enough to be vulnerable to cancellation on the grounds of non-use because you never know if the trade mark owner has access to, or the inclination to find, the evidence it needs to prove genuine use”. 

“In 2016, the UKIPO revoked the UK registration of Gucci’s famous interlocking G’s logo, again on the grounds of non-use, and the inadequacy of the evidence Gucci filed in defense of its registration”.  

“For trade mark owners (Davids as well as Goliaths), these decisions highlight the importance of archiving evidence to demonstrate genuine use of a trade mark, and, what-is-more, archiving evidence that is as specific and detailed as possible.  You never know when you may need it.  And the consequences of not being able to prove genuine use can be catastrophic.

At Wynne Jones IP we are experts in trademark law, supporting our clients in creating enforceable trade mark registrations and valuable business assets, which lead to commercial prosperity and maximum IP protection within your specialist field.

For more information on our trade mark services please visit https://www.wynne-jones.com/our-ip-services/trade-marks/

Related News

Breaking EPO News - Decision G 2/19 - oral hearings of the Boards of Appeal can take place in Haar, and third parties cannot appeal clarity of claims during examination procedure.
news

Breaking EPO News - Decision G 2/19 - oral hearings of the Boards of Appeal can take place in Haar, and third parties cannot appeal clarity of claims during examination procedure.

Breaking EPO News - Decision G 2/19 - oral hearings of the Boards of Appeal can take place in Haar, and third parties cannot appeal clarity of claims during examination procedure.

In one of the fastest ever decisions on a referral, the EPO's Enlarged Board of Appeal yesterday (18 July 2019) found in case G 2/19 that (EPO brief communication; Google translation):

"A third party within the meaning of Article 115 EPC, who has appealed against the decision to grant a European patent, has no right to be heard by a Board of Appeal of the European Patent Office orally over its request to remove allegedly indistinct claims (Article 84 EPC) of the European patent to re-enter the examination procedure. Such a complaint does not have suspensive effect.

 

Wynne-Jones IP Supports Pride Month
news

Wynne-Jones IP Supports Pride Month

This weekend see's 50 years of Pride in London as the parade celebrates it's jubilee year and to mark the occasion we took the opportunity to speak to HR Manager, Lucy Gabb and Renewals Administrator, Liam Harkus about their experiences of being gay in the workplace. 

International Women in Engineering - Meet Christina Schiavone
news

International Women in Engineering - Meet Christina Schiavone

In honour of International Women in Engineering Day we wanted to introduce you to one of our engineers, Christina Schiavone.

Wynne-Jones IP raises profile of Mental Health Awareness with a week of wellbeing activities
news

Mental Health Awareness Week 2019 took place from the 13th to the 19th of May and Wynne-Jones IP highlighted its dedication to the wellbeing of its staff with a week-long programme of wellness activities.

Commercial Director and practising Psychotherapist Dr Jayne Nation said, “At Wynne-Jones we take the care of our staff’s mental and physical wellbeing seriously and believe it is our duty to create a healthy and happy working environment for them. The events that took place during Mental Health Awareness Week were fantastic and an opportunity to learn a lot about not only ourselves but also each other.

“We will continue to push this initiative throughout the company and implement programmes that will benefit our staff in all aspects of their lives for the long term.”

Wynne-Jones IP Bolsters Trade Mark and Patent Teams in London and Cardiff Offices
news

Wynne-Jones IP Bolsters Trade Mark and Patent Teams in London and Cardiff Offices

Wynne-Jones IP, has welcomed two experienced IP specialists to its patent and trade mark teams as it continues to grow its two offices in London and Cardiff.  Yvonne Onomor joins Wynne-Jones in London as Senior Trade Mark & Design Attorney; Xuesong Yang joins the firm’s Cardiff office as Chinese Patent Attorney.

Plant patents at the EPO - is an amended EU Biotech Directive (98/44/EC) on the horizon?
news

Plant patents at the EPO - is an amended EU Biotech Directive (98/44/EC) on the horizon?

The saga of plant patents at the EPO continues - do recent events at the EPO and the European Commission suggest that there will be an attempt to amend the EU Biotech Directive 98/44/EC?

Patent Emergency! What to do when you’ve (accidentally) disclosed your invention before you’ve filed a patent application
news

Patent Emergency! What to do when you’ve (accidentally) disclosed your invention before you’ve filed a patent application

One of the cornerstones of the patent system in many countries, including the UK, is the need to apply for a patent before disclosing your invention publicly. This is because such ‘self-disclosure’ can be used to invalidate a subsequently filed patent application. That’s a horrible situation, because you may have really shot yourself in the foot in terms of getting patent protection in the UK and in many other countries. Therefore, we firmly advise that you keep the invention secret before filing a patent application on the invention.

IP expert praises one million women in STEM roles to mark International Day of Women and Girls in Science
news

IP expert praises one million women in STEM roles to mark International Day of Women and Girls in Science

A leading intellectual property expert has said it is “incredibly encouraging” to see almost one million women in STEM roles for the first time, but called for continued action to support this upwards trend.

aipex logo aipex logo aipex logo