News & Events about IP just for you
News Events
resize 3 question

What should I be doing now? Part 1 – To file or not to file?

The up-turn since the Brexit vote (23.06.16) in the number of UK trade mark and design filings is continuing apace, but does it really make sense? 
 
The Chartered Institute of Trade Mark Attorneys is lobbying for EU trade mark applications and registrations to be transferred automatically into UK equivalents after Brexit.  This option (known as “the Montenegro”) has found favour with the UK IPO, who know there is a mountain of work coming their way, and so welcome any proposals that look like they will save time and effort. 
 
However, “the Montenegro” is only one of at least eight options being considered and there is ongoing uncertainty about the timings and mechanisms by which EU trade marks will be revalidated in the UK after Brexit.  Meanwhile, risk-averse businesses are continuing to refille their entire EU portfolios as UK trade marks. They do not want to leave anything to chance.
 
Amidst all of this, we realized at the recent INTA meeting in Barcelona that UK attorneys are giving widely conflicting advice to trade mark owners and their representatives. 

 
Here is what we think:
 
 We are advising clients to file both EU and UK national applications for any new mark that is intended to be used both in the EU and the UK.  This seems to us to be the pragmatic approach, taking into account the desire for certainty, versus cost and risk.  It removes any need to worry about whatever system is put in place
(….if any…..) for dividing up EU trade marks after Brexit.

 With existing EU trade marks, for those who want certainty, refilling in the UK is also a good option.  The problem with automatic revalidation of EU marks in the UK if “the Montenegro” is adopted is that it is likely to provoke a scramble between owners of conflicting rights as to who has the dominant rights in the UK.  (Rights in the UK can be based on use as well as registration, so it is not as simple as just looking at the register). 

However, the position with existing marks is less clear cut than with new ones because newly filed replacement UK applications will only have infringement rights from their (new) filing dates.  Therefore, for some trade mark owners with existing (and especially old) EU applications and registrations, refilling now in the UK will not be attractive.  To borrow a phrase popular with trade mark examiners the world over “each case has to be considered on its merits". 

We encourage all of our clients and friends around the world to contact us if they are unsure what to do.

Featured

NFTs - the new way to exploit your IP

NFTs - the new way to exploit your IP

Non-fungible tokens are the latest fashion in the cyber world. Building on blockchain technology, NFTs may be a new way to exploit intellectual property rights.

+

Related News

EPO Fee Increases 1 April 2024

EPO Fee Increases 1 April 2024

 The European Patent Office (EPO) has again announced a set of fee increases[1] on procedural fees, to be effective from 1 April 2024.

+
The Future is Coming, Faster Than Ever

The Future is Coming, Faster Than Ever

Throughout history, we have witnessed periods of significant technological advancements that have revolutionised society. We are now in the age of information, biotechnology, and the renewable energy revolution. We are witnessing, and will continue to witness, massive leaps forward in technology bringing with them significant social and cultural changes. This is all happening at a speed never seen before.

+
Support for Cheltenham Open Door During 2023

Support for Cheltenham Open Door During 2023

Throughout 2023, Wynne-Jones IP supported local charity,Cheltenham Open Door. Over the course of the year our active Chairty & Social Team organised fundraising events and donation rallies to enable the small, independent charity to provide much needed support in the community.

+
We asked ChatGPT about intellectual property. Here's what we found...

We asked ChatGPT about intellectual property. Here's what we found...

ChatGPT is, undoubtedly, a remarkable tool that is revolutionising the way people work. But, like a lot of technology it has its pitfalls - we’ve all seen the headlines about bias, misinformation and students using it to generate work. We asked it what the top five questions people were asking about intellectual property in the UK, to provide the answers and then asked our expert IP attorneys what they thought.

+
Semiconductors are the future and the UK has huge opportunity

Semiconductors are the future and the UK has huge opportunity

The UK Government has recently announced a 10-year strategy and £1billion investment plan in the semiconductor industry. Reaction has been mixed: some have said that it’s a “starting gun on a bright future” while others say that it’s simply not enough. We talked to semiconductor experts Dr Ian Lambert and Dr Elliott Davies of Wynne-Jones IP to find out what semiconductors are and to get their thoughts on the announcement.

+
The scope of protection of a patent is fundamental to whether a patent is infringed.

The scope of protection of a patent is fundamental to whether a patent is infringed.

In 2017 the U.K. Supreme Court issued its landmark ruling in Actavis v Eli Lilly [2017], that fundamentally changed how U.K. patent infringement is assessed, by the (re-) introduction of a ‘doctrine of equivalents’, in which a feature that falls outside of a ‘normal’ interpretation of the claims but that nonetheless varies from the invention in a way that is ‘immaterial’,  infringes a U.K. patent. This can provide a U.K. patent with a broader scope of protection than was the case prior to the Actavis decision.

Here we look at how the Actavis decision has been applied and developed in subsequent decisions by the U.K. courts.

+
Contact US
How can we help